Water Cooler Games - Junk-Food Games: Game Rhetoric in the WSJ

Junk-Food Games: Game Rhetoric in the WSJ
May 3, 2004 - by Ian Bogost

Big article in the Wall Street Journal today on Junk-Food Games (paid subscription required): "Online Arcades Draw Fire For Immersing Kids in Ads; Ritz Bits Wrestling, Anyone?"

Some interesting excerpts:

Marketers love Web games because they deliver brand messages cost-effectively. The cost to air a 30-second TV commercial ranges from $7.31 per thousand viewers during the day to $29.90 during prime time, according to SQAD Inc., a Tarrytown, N.Y., media-research firm. In contrast, there are no costs to "air" advergames. Spreading developments costs across the typical number of players, advergaming can cost less than $2 per thousand users, proponents say.

And...

Some worry that the absorbing nature of the games, the age of many of the players and the data collected in the surveys make for an uneven playing field. Advertisers are "being allowed to prey on your weakness," says Jeff Chester, head of the Center for Digital Democracy, a Washington, D.C., watchdog. Companies can create "little profiles of children and dangle ads for fast foods and snacks that they know they have a weakness for," he adds. "I consider that kind of advertising to be really unfair."

Clearly, there's not just a little bit of melodrama going on here, but I guess that's par for the course. But what's most interesting to me is that advertisers, consumers, and the media are admitting that game rhetoric does exist, which is great. As for the conclusions, well, Wildtangent EVP David Madden says, "As opposed to a 30-second commercial where you're being beaten over the head with the message, these games are a very benevolent approach to marketing." Forrester analyst Catherine Li calls advergames a "sly approach."

I wonder if what we are really seeing in these comments is not only a response to junk food, but also a response to the very idea that games can perform rhetorically. No matter the individual fears about this topic, the public acknowledgment of rhetoric in games is promising, and important.

Comments (2) | Post a Comment | TrackBack (0)

Comment from Frasca on May 4, 2004

The article is accesible without registration here: http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/05/03/financial0945EDT0022.DTL

Comment from stacie on August 31, 2005

nah -uh! Personally i love playing the games for the fun! i am a very healthy child, and i never eat junk food! So ur believes ar totally wrong dude!

POST A COMMENT

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

TRACKBACKS

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.watercoolergames.org/mt-tback.cgi/136

Links to weblogs that reference Junk-Food Games: Game Rhetoric in the WSJ will be listed here.