Works fine on my Mac. At least on the technical level, the controls are far from great. On the other hand, I like the graphics. What I really hate is the fact that they force you to read the instructions. I can imagine the client behind it, thinking that it is important to force the message down the throat of poor players. I agree that the game could have taken another approach, but it is also true that it seems to be targeted to children (even though I am not totally about this). It is always so hard to judge advergames without knowing the brief behind it.

Works fine on my Mac. At least on the technical level, the controls are far from great. On the other hand, I like the graphics. What I really hate is the fact that they force you to read the instructions. I can imagine the client behind it, thinking that it is important to force the message down the throat of poor players. I agree that the game could have taken another approach, but it is also true that it seems to be targeted to children (even though I am not totally about this). It is always so hard to judge advergames without knowing the brief behind it.

Even ignoring the gameplay issues, it strikes me that characterizing loggers and the World Bank as slick villians in business suits with ridiculous chainsaw wielding robots would alienate anyone who doesn't already agree with The Rainforest Foundation.

Games are inherently simulations of one sort or another, so I think they are more effective when the game content appears balanced and true to reality. There's certainly enough injustice and conflict in the world to drive these games, without having to invent any and erode the credibility of the game.

ljljjgkjjoiffhfdifhdfugfyuyt ttiutitiutrturtrut

really boring who doesn't want to destroy things

really boring who doesn't want to destroy things