| ![]() |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
a forum for the uses of videogames in advertising, politics, education, and other everyday activities, outside the sphere of entertainment
ABOUT About This Site - RSS Feed Ian Bogost (editor) Gonzalo Frasca (editor emeritus) SPONSORS
COMMUNITY
|
Extra! Reuters using news story to manipulate readers May 5, 2006 - by Gonzalo Frasca Here's a link to a Reuters article called "Islamists using US video games in youth appeal". Frankly, I find it misleading, manipulative and a clear example of propaganda. Propaganda as in twisting facts with ideological goals. Basically, the article quotes Dan Devlin, a Defense Department public diplomacy specialist. This fellow gave a talk to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and argued that al Quaeda and other groups have created mods of popular videogames where they inversed the good guy/bad guy relationship and Americans ended up as the ones to kill. Comment from josh g. on May 5, 2006
Comment from josh g. on May 5, 2006
Joke backfires! I didn't notice that the article is actually referring to a BF2 mod. Although I guess that just makes the whole story even more ridiculous, especially given this line: "'Battlefield 2' ordinarily shows U.S. troops engaging forces from China or a united Middle East coalition." Er, if all you care about is the intro video, then I guess that's the case. In the game itself you routinely play as any of the above sides, at random. Sigh. Comment from Elizabeth Losh on May 5, 2006
Today, I looked a little deeper into this story on virtualpolitik and have ordered transcripts from the congressional hearings that Gonzalo mentions. I haven't seen his actual testimony, but it sounds like Devlin clearly has his own ideological agenda that has nothing to do with either gaming culture or understanding how digital media function as venues for political resistance. See Robert Malley's work on Internet jihadist sites for a very different view of "propaganda." Comment from Manuel on May 6, 2006
My newest hobby is Blog reads that is more intresanter than newspapers or television. in the between time I spend already 4-5 hours at the computer. Writes firmly thereby I also still enough-end to read has. Comment from Jabrwock on May 11, 2006
Comment from Brian Carnell on May 16, 2006
"If al Quaeda is indeed using videogames to lure young people into fighting a hate war against the US, then I find that use of games to be despicable. But then the same would have to apply to America's Army. It's a shame that journalists just write down whatever they get fed, without questioning it." The equating of American and Al Qaeda propaganda is itself despicable. But then given how you jumped to the conclusion to blame Reuters for accurately reporting on this presentation by Devlin (who clearly is an idiot), obviously you prefer to not to think before you write. Comment from Gonzalo Frasca on May 16, 2006
If you carefully read the posts, I started by getting mad at Reuters for not doing good journalism and not mentioning that videogame propaganda is not a terrorist-only game. That was my original complaint, before learning about the fact that the video was fake evidence (actually, I even questioned the possibility that the video was real. And my gut feeling was right, as it was later proven). In addition to this, the original reports that pointed out to the fact that this was SonicJihad's video were the ones who blamed Reuters. I admit that I thought to blame Reuters, but I did not post about it (that was Ian's post, my colleague here, who later on reliased his mistake because he was misled by those early posts). I do my best to think before I write but still make mistakes. In any case, even if our coverage has mistakes, we immediately corrected them and pointed them out. Sadly, that has not been the case of most tradtional media, who just left the story die. Secondly, this is a game that deals with rhetoric and propaganda. Under those terms, American and (so far imaginary) Al Quaeda propaganda videogames are analyzed under similar terms. This does not mean that I necessarily equate them as political groups. Personally, I do not like videogames being used for recruiting soldiers, no matter what their flag is. I equate propaganda on that level, too. You may agree with it or not, that is up to you. But it is not enough to accuse me of writing without thinking. Comment from Nixon on November 15, 2006
Comment from Robert on November 30, 2006
POST A COMMENT
TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.watercoolergames.org/mt-tback.cgi/551
Links to weblogs that reference Extra! Reuters using news story to manipulate readers will be listed here.
|
SELF PROMOTION
My New Column: Disjunctive Play
Gamasutra has published my latest "Persuasive Games" column, Disjunctive Play. The column mostly discusses Jason Rohrer's new game Between, but ... Missile in the HASTAC The HASTAC consortium has just announced a forum hosted by their HASTAC Scholars fellows on digital games, entitled Participatory Play: ... Pekid Oil Molleindustria has released a new game about the history and hypothetical future of oil, called Oiligarchy. The game feature's M's ... Announcing the Journalism & Games Research Project I'm excited to announce the first public materials from a research project on Journalism and Videogames, which I've been pursuing ... Politics and Games at Harvard It's been quiet around here! Next week I'll share the cause of it. Until then, I did a talk at ... Click Archaeology One More Election Game My New Column: The Birth and Death of the Election Game Truth Invaders Mad Men Jeopardy FAVORITES Does expression come in HD too?
Food Force
A Force More Complicated
PSP and Performance Intelligence
A Review of the Leapster
ALSO VISIT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © Ian Bogost & Gonzalo Frasca, unless otherwise noted. Re-printing for commercial purposes by permission only (contact us: ). Re-printing for educational purposes is allowed with proper attribution. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||