RECENT COMMENTS

ADVERTISERS

Advertise via Culture Pundits





Water Cooler Games

a forum for the uses of videogames in advertising, politics, education, and other everyday activities, outside the sphere of entertainment



ABOUT
About This Site - RSS Feed

Ian Bogost (editor)
Gonzalo Frasca (editor emeritus)


SPONSORS
Visit Persuasive Games
Visit Powerful Robot


COMMUNITY

The Tyranny of Casual Games
March 13, 2007 - by Ian Bogost

Hollywood Reporter columnist Paul Hyman offers a welcome view on casual games, arguing that imitations and clones are diluting the market. The article primarily considers the question of developer/publisher rights and IP -- particularly whether gameplay is subject to copyright protection. Hyman also points out that the portals are starting to make more money from ads than game sales, so the games themselves matter less and less.

One factor the article does not consider is the effect of all this cloning on the future attention of casual game players. Casual games were supposed to promise small budgets, accessible digital distribution, and more general audiences. But what they have produced is a perverse obsession with a market of zombie clickers. Casual games of the downloadable try-before-you-buy on a traditional portal type are tyrannizing small-scale PC/Mac games in general. Given so many iterations of the same game, and given that most trials provide adequate satisfaction (thus the 1-2% conversion), casual games have become a commodity. Buying a casual game is more like buying shampoo than deciding what film to Netflix this week. There is a real risk that casual/downloadable games as commodity will confuse and dilute the future potential of experimental and indie games on the PC/Mac, especially those distributed via digital download.

Developers are in a rough spot: as Hyman points out, casual games can provide revenue enough so that, in the words of one developer, "you can then go out and build the game you really care about." But supporting the casual games market also may reduce the chances of getting that game you really care about distributed -- unless it's a clone of another game on the portal's top 10.



Comment from Patrick Dugan on March 13, 2007

The consensus that IP and branding are important isn't new (if my current project didn't have a great artist. However, most important in my mind, is dynamical innovation. If you can get a bit of mechanical innovation in there and then tease out lots of interesting extensibility while keeping it in tune with your original metaphor, you'll have something worth buying.


POST A COMMENT

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?



TRACKBACKS

SELF PROMOTION

RECENT ARTICLES
New Journal: The Computer Game Education Review

RIT professor Stephen Jacobs is the editor-in-chief of a new journal, The Computer Game Education Review. Here's the blurb he ...

You Drive Like an Old Man

Insurance company Liberty Mutual has created Driver Seat, which they bill as "the world's first senior driving simulator." The game ...

Games for Change: Documentary Games

A bit late, I suppose, but I wanted to post my notes from the Documentary Games panel at last month's ...

Humana's Games for Health Contest

Humana's games for health division has announced a new contest, Insert Coin for game concepts that meet the broad goal ...

Distraction, Comfort, Sedation

I've known for some time that hospitals have used videogames for some time as experimental tools to help children relax ...

Games for Change 2009: Nicholas Kristof Keynote

Toilet Training for iPhone

Bailout! the Board Game

1066

Guru Meditation for Atari and iPhone


FAVORITES

ALSO VISIT
  Copyright © Ian Bogost & Gonzalo Frasca, unless otherwise noted. Re-printing for commercial purposes by permission only (contact us: ). Re-printing for educational purposes is allowed with proper attribution.