|
| |
 |
|
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
 a forum for the uses of videogames in advertising, politics, education, and other everyday activities, outside the sphere of entertainment
ABOUT About This Site - RSS Feed Ian Bogost (editor) Gonzalo Frasca (editor emeritus) SPONSORS
COMMUNITY
|
|
A Taste of Our Own Rhetoric July 19, 2007 - by Ian Bogost The big story this week in political games is Rescue the Nuke Scientist, the Union of Students Islamic Association's videogame response to Kuma\War's Assault on Iran. Most of the coverage I could find described the game's basic premise: In "Rescue the Nuke Scientist," U.S. troops capture a husband-and-wife team of nuclear engineers during a pilgrimage to Karbala, a holy site for Shiite Muslims, in central Iraq. Game players take on the role of Iranian security forces carrying out a mission code-named "The Special Operation," which involves penetrating fortified locations to free the nuclear scientists, who are moved from Iraq to Israel.
To complete the game successfully, players have to enter Israel to rescue the nuclear scientists, kill U.S. and Israeli troops and seize their laptops containing secret information. What I haven't seen anyone take note of, however, is how literally the Iranian game adopts traditional Western game conventions in order to turn them on their head. Read the official description again. The rhetorical position of this game is so indistinguishable from any number of real or hypothetical U.S.-produced games about foreign insurgents. Don't believe me? Compare it to Kuma's official description of Assault on Iran, the Kuma\War mission to which the Iranian game responds. As a Special Forces soldier in this playable mission, you will infiltrate Iran's nuclear facility at Natanz, located 150 miles south of Iran's capital of Teheran. But breaching the security cordon around the hardened target won't be easy. Your team's mission: Infiltrate the base, secure evidence of illegal uranium enrichment, rescue your man on the inside, and destroy the centrifuges that promise to take Iran into the nuclear age.
In Persuasive Games, I argue that the main procedural rhetoric of America's Army is in the commutativity of the game's American soldiers and the nameless insurgents they fight -- every player in the game sees themselves as the good guys (the Army) and the opposing players as the bad guys (the plainclothes guerillas), no matter which side they are playing. Something very similar is at the heart of Rescue the Nuke Scientist, but this time it is more deliberate. No matter one's opinion about Iran's nuclear capabilities and what the U.S. or anyone else should do about it, the rhetorical power of the game is in how adeptly it adopts the logic of Western rescue-justified invasions. Zach Whalen bemoans the fact that neither game has any hope of persuading the other side to change its mind. But while Kuma\War's mission just reinforces the American position (albeit in the guise of newsgame-style reporting, as Keith Stuart notes), Rescue the Nuke Scientist has a very different goal: to expose that position on the world stage by showing how easily it can be copied almost action-for-action to support an opposing point of view. It is thus ironic when Union of Students Islamic Association leader describes the game as "our defense against the enemy's cultural onslaught," since they use their enemy's own logic to express their own position. Hopefully the rather obvious lesson we can learn from both these games is that unilateralism is always equally one-sided, no matter whose side it supports. Comment from Patrick Dugan on July 19, 2007
Comment from harrytheplumber on July 25, 2007
Where can I get a copy of this well developed political criticism? Thanks for writing a great review of the game, but no-one has included contact websites or any real details of the group that made it! Everyone else just copied and pasted the AP story to their websites! Comment from Ian Bogost on July 25, 2007
You're right, and this is an ongoing problem with games from the middle east: they are very hard to get one's hands on in the west. Many of us are looking, hopefully we can find out how to get access, if it's even possible. POST A COMMENT
TRACKBACKS
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.watercoolergames.org/mt-tback.cgi/824
Links to weblogs that reference A Taste of Our Own Rhetoric will be listed here.
|
|
|
|
SELF PROMOTION
RECENT ARTICLES Free Political Game for Politicians
Positech, the single-man UK developer of simulation games like Kudos and Democracy 2, has announced that it will give away ... Make a Serious Game, Win Cash Whosegame, another make-your-own-game website tool things, is sponsoring a contest to create a serious game using their tools. The game ... Speak & Spell, 30 Years Later Vintage Computing and Gaming has published an interview with Richard Wiggins, one of the developers of Texas Instruments' 1978 electronic ... AIG UFO Exec Catcher Remember that whole financial bailout thing? And remember how AIG got in some hot water for spending almost half a ... An MMORPG for Learning Chinese Characters From South Korean company Eduflo comes Hanjamaru, an MMORPG designed to teach elementary school children Chinese characters. Characters are depicted ... Bush Shoe Tabloid Games Free Market Capitalism: The Game Nintendo DS Spa jOGging In Place Today and Tomorrow: Living Game Worlds IV at Georgia Tech FAVORITES Does expression come in HD too?
Food Force
A Force More Complicated
PSP and Performance Intelligence
A Review of the Leapster
ALSO VISIT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © Ian Bogost & Gonzalo Frasca, unless otherwise noted. Re-printing for commercial purposes by permission only (contact us: ). Re-printing for educational purposes is allowed with proper attribution. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
