RECENT COMMENTS

ADVERTISERS

Advertise via Culture Pundits





Water Cooler Games

a forum for the uses of videogames in advertising, politics, education, and other everyday activities, outside the sphere of entertainment



ABOUT
About This Site - RSS Feed

Ian Bogost (editor)
Gonzalo Frasca (editor emeritus)


SPONSORS
Visit Persuasive Games
Visit Powerful Robot


COMMUNITY

Tactical Iraqi's Wikipedia Spin
August 15, 2007 - by Ian Bogost

A year and a half ago, Gonzalo ignited a debate here on WCG about Tactical Iraqi, a game funded by DARPA and created at USC ISI. Gonzalo's took the position that there is no moral way to support U.S. military aggression, even if it seems

Sometimes I follow referral links into the site, and today I noticed that we were getting some clicks from the Wikipedia page about the game (officially titled, Tactical Language & Culture Training System). Imagine my surprise upon reading how it concludes:

There has been little controversy about the use of the software in the serious games development community. After viewing the emphasis the language teaching program places upon the culture of the community where the lessons will be applied, even skeptics are hard pressed to find fault with the system.

What? Little controversy? Clearly the entry has been cleverly modified to put the product in the best possible light from the perspective of its creators. To get the full extent of the alteration, read the salient edit.

Last month I pointed this out to WCG friend Liz Losh, who has written extensively about the game, who wrote some extensive thoughts about the Wikipedia edits, including a link to a NY Times story about the journalistic uses of Wikipedia. Clearly the article is in violation of numerous Wikipedia guidelines, but what I find more interesting is that someone saw the opposition as a credible enough threat -- perhaps to the project's commercial prospects -- that they felt compelled to edit it.



Comment from Gabriel Heinrichs on August 15, 2007

By making this salient edit, 'Phoenix76' probably intends to win the hearts and minds of Wikipedia users. I've rarely see 'em as blatant as this one - even on Wikipedia (a system even skeptics are hard pressed to find faults with [citation needed]).

Comment from Liz Losh on August 20, 2007

Looks like someone came in and reverted to the text of the paragraph that I wrote about Tactical iraqi, which included Gonzalo's critique. Whoever it was, this editor noted, "the original was sourced, the replacement unsourced and POV."


POST A COMMENT

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?



TRACKBACKS

SELF PROMOTION

RECENT ARTICLES
My New Column: Disjunctive Play

Gamasutra has published my latest "Persuasive Games" column, Disjunctive Play. The column mostly discusses Jason Rohrer's new game Between, but ...

Missile in the HASTAC

The HASTAC consortium has just announced a forum hosted by their HASTAC Scholars fellows on digital games, entitled Participatory Play: ...

Pekid Oil

Molleindustria has released a new game about the history and hypothetical future of oil, called Oiligarchy. The game feature's M's ...

Announcing the Journalism & Games Research Project

I'm excited to announce the first public materials from a research project on Journalism and Videogames, which I've been pursuing ...

Politics and Games at Harvard

It's been quiet around here! Next week I'll share the cause of it. Until then, I did a talk at ...

Click Archaeology

One More Election Game

My New Column: The Birth and Death of the Election Game

Truth Invaders

Mad Men Jeopardy


FAVORITES

ALSO VISIT
  Copyright © Ian Bogost & Gonzalo Frasca, unless otherwise noted. Re-printing for commercial purposes by permission only (contact us: ). Re-printing for educational purposes is allowed with proper attribution.