RECENT COMMENTS

ADVERTISERS

Advertise via Culture Pundits





Water Cooler Games

a forum for the uses of videogames in advertising, politics, education, and other everyday activities, outside the sphere of entertainment



ABOUT
About This Site - RSS Feed

Ian Bogost (editor)
Gonzalo Frasca (editor emeritus)


SPONSORS
Visit Persuasive Games
Visit Powerful Robot


COMMUNITY

Scholastic Defiles Self, World with Game-Book Tie-ins
December 19, 2007 - by Ian Bogost

Scholastic, the textbook publisher Kaiser Permanente paid off to publish their craptastic nutrition game, is back with more cross-media garbage for you and your tween.

Now that the Harry Potter series is complete, Scholastic is eager to get a new franchise out. According to a story in the New York Times today, the series, called The 39 Clues will feature 10 books, apparently to be penned by different authors including Gordon Korman and Rick Riordan. But in addition, as the Times reports "many children are now as transfixed by Internet and video games as they are by reading." According to Scholastic, "reading the books will make you better at the games," thus completing what I desperately hope friend and colleague Henry Jenkins doesn't celebrate as an example of "convergence," but instead sees as the schlock that it really is.

Ready to be more offended? Check this out:

The series is also Scholastic's attempt to create a branded franchise for which it owns all the rights. Ms. Rowling retained the rights to the Harry Potter series, which meant that she could pursue separate deals for film and other licensed products, effectively cutting out Scholastic.

I have my problems with Harry Potter, most of which I talked about in Persuasive Games and in my review of Jenkins' book, but 39 Clues is completely manufactured by Scholastic -- it's the Hannah Montana of the kids book world. Imagine the gaul, JK Rowling retaining the rights to the work she created!

(thanks to Karen, with apologies for lambasting her new gig)



Comment from josh giesbrecht on December 19, 2007

Or the Nancy Drew / Hardy Boys of our century. Which, strangely, doesn't sound as offensive despite the fact that they were considered the same sort of publisher-driven shlock in their times.


POST A COMMENT

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?




SELF PROMOTION

RECENT ARTICLES
New Journal: The Computer Game Education Review

RIT professor Stephen Jacobs is the editor-in-chief of a new journal, The Computer Game Education Review. Here's the blurb he ...

You Drive Like an Old Man

Insurance company Liberty Mutual has created Driver Seat, which they bill as "the world's first senior driving simulator." The game ...

Games for Change: Documentary Games

A bit late, I suppose, but I wanted to post my notes from the Documentary Games panel at last month's ...

Humana's Games for Health Contest

Humana's games for health division has announced a new contest, Insert Coin for game concepts that meet the broad goal ...

Distraction, Comfort, Sedation

I've known for some time that hospitals have used videogames for some time as experimental tools to help children relax ...

Games for Change 2009: Nicholas Kristof Keynote

Toilet Training for iPhone

Bailout! the Board Game

1066

Guru Meditation for Atari and iPhone


FAVORITES

ALSO VISIT
  Copyright © Ian Bogost & Gonzalo Frasca, unless otherwise noted. Re-printing for commercial purposes by permission only (contact us: ). Re-printing for educational purposes is allowed with proper attribution.