| ![]() |
|
|
|
a forum for the uses of videogames in advertising, politics, education, and other everyday activities, outside the sphere of entertainment
ABOUT About This Site - RSS Feed Ian Bogost (editor) Gonzalo Frasca (editor emeritus) SPONSORS
COMMUNITY
|
Indie Games Have No Mainstream to Oppose March 7, 2008 - by Ian Bogost Andreas Jan-Sudmann has an article in the newly released issue of the journal Eludamos. In Innovation NOT Opposition: The Logic of Distinction of Independent Games, Jan-Sudmann argues that indie games have no coherent mainstream to oppose, and they founder partly for this reason. The author locates this problem both in indie and mainstream games, wondering if the latter aren't mainstream enough culturally to support a viable indie opposition. Here's a key part of the argument: That such an aesthetic in which the oppositional logic is embedded visibly does not exist yet or only marginally may have various reasons - and that is beyond the doubtlessly basic problem that the aesthetic conventions of popular games still are too vague and on the part of producers and game users have been internalised only insignificantly to enfold directed dynamics of distinction in the sense of a much-cited 'indie spirit'. Perhaps digital games are primarily understood to be an aesthetic practice that should be or is decidedly accessible (popular) and not resistant or difficile. Perhaps the discomfort with cultural mainstream forms is not that much pronounced that it presses developers of independent games forward to create explicitly visible or tangible counter culture aesthetics. Perhaps it is because popular computer games are not regarded as mainstream.
While independent films have distinguished themselves from the cultural mainstream by constantly displaying controversial, provocative images and topics, in computer games there already are numerous blockbuster products that represent these very attributes of an alternative practice. Not least due to the lasting controversial image of commercial computer games in general independent games find decidedly less starting points to individuate as an alternative culture via provocative 'subversive' forms of games. At any rate, excessive violence as an articulation of distinction drops out. It's an interesting argument, and I find myself wishing the article had been longer and more detailed. Specifically, the alternate strategy of innovation gets short shrift, despite the title's promise to oppose the two. The author uses flOw as a counterexample, but doesn't generalize a theory of innovation in indie games. One way of making this more explicit might be this: indie games have tended to innovate at the level of mechanics rather than at the level of representation. POST A COMMENT
|
SELF PROMOTION
New Journal: The Computer Game Education Review
RIT professor Stephen Jacobs is the editor-in-chief of a new journal, The Computer Game Education Review. Here's the blurb he ... You Drive Like an Old Man Insurance company Liberty Mutual has created Driver Seat, which they bill as "the world's first senior driving simulator." The game ... Games for Change: Documentary Games A bit late, I suppose, but I wanted to post my notes from the Documentary Games panel at last month's ... Humana's Games for Health Contest Humana's games for health division has announced a new contest, Insert Coin for game concepts that meet the broad goal ... Distraction, Comfort, Sedation I've known for some time that hospitals have used videogames for some time as experimental tools to help children relax ... Games for Change 2009: Nicholas Kristof Keynote Toilet Training for iPhone Bailout! the Board Game 1066 Guru Meditation for Atari and iPhone FAVORITES Does expression come in HD too?
Food Force
A Force More Complicated
PSP and Performance Intelligence
A Review of the Leapster
ALSO VISIT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © Ian Bogost & Gonzalo Frasca, unless otherwise noted. Re-printing for commercial purposes by permission only (contact us: ). Re-printing for educational purposes is allowed with proper attribution. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||